NUDD identifies where deeper risk analysis and validation are needed. It complements — but does not replace — DFMEA, DRBFM or technical risk assessment.
Score what is New, Unique, Different, and Difficult — then focus engineering effort where uncertainty and opportunity are highest.
| Feature or Function | Dimensions | Exposure | Suggested Response | Evidence / Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No features or functions yet. Click “+ Add Feature or Function” above to begin. | ||||
No features or functions yet. Tap “+ Add Feature or Function” above to begin.
Reference guide. In the table above, rate each dimension's severity from 0 (none) to 3 (high).
Saved locally in this browser only — never uploaded. Use “Clear saved data” to remove it, or export/print for a permanent record.
Run this assessment during concept selection, design reviews, or DRBFM/change-point discussions to decide where DFMEA and test-strategy effort should concentrate. For each feature or function, rate all four NUDD dimensions from 0 to 3 in the table; use the question matrix above as a guide. Items scored Medium, High, or flagged Elevated priority need a documented Evidence / Gap entry to be marked complete — but every named item, complete or not, counts toward the summary below.
Example: a feature that introduces a new sensor architecture with limited field data and an unresolved integration question will score High and surface in the top items — even if most other features in the same product are Low or Medium.