Score what is New, Unique, Different, and Difficult — then focus engineering effort where uncertainty and opportunity are highest.
| Feature or Function | Dimensions | NUDD Score | NUDD Level | Justification or Evidence | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No features or functions yet. Click “+ Add Feature or Function” above to begin. | |||||
Reference guide. In the table above, select which dimensions apply to a feature, then set each one's severity from 0 (none) to 3 (high).
This assessment is held in your browser for this session only and is not saved. Export or print before leaving or refreshing.
Run this assessment during concept selection, design reviews, or DRBFM/change-point discussions to decide where DFMEA and test-strategy effort should concentrate. For each feature or function, select which NUDD dimensions apply, then rate each selected dimension's severity from 0 to 3 in the table; use the question matrix below it as a guide. Dimensions left unselected count as 0. Items scored Medium or High require a documented justification or evidence gap; Low items do not.
Example: a feature that introduces a new sensor architecture with limited field data and an unresolved integration question will score High and surface at the top of the summary — even if most other features in the same product are Low or Medium.
Related reading: What is a NUDD assessment?